|
楼主 |
发表于 2004-8-13 02:51
|
显示全部楼层
Asian Cinema Thrives
8 Z; S) |. P3 \6 ]" k- Why is Korea so powerful? , h, q. {3 `" e, x$ s2 C# y7 o1 c
4 [" b0 E# a- m C2 L; z# S
$ o; e4 k, n+ r! U, Z+ N2 B# Z
: R& o5 j5 k: j& U2 b f* Q T4 l r9 i7 B4 G5 s
Korean cinema. It is the most powerful film industry in today's Asia, but what changes have made it so? This forum looked for answers to this question behind the scene in Korea as well as looking at the present situations both of Philippine cinema, a continuously prosperous industry, and Mongolia's endangered filmmaking, in order to examine how Asian films stand out today. The guests were Bong Joon-Ho (director) and Cho Yong-Gyu (cinematographer), both from the Korean film, Barking Dogs Never Bite, T. Sarantuya (director) of the Mongolian A Vanishing Trade, and Rory B. Quintos (director) of Child from the Philippines. The Film Festival Director General Tadao Sato joined as the forum coordinator.7 A, t! x s8 T
================================7 d# R! P$ p8 d5 `4 s' M1 }" R) e
" Q9 ]8 u8 o5 y2 E: t" R
http://www.focus-on-asia.com/e/r ... es/bong_joon-ho.jpg8 {. T. w8 ? F6 W" u5 r
* B2 A! p3 q1 ]# u
Director Bong Joon-Ho
0 D0 M% u; W9 \(BARKING DOGS NEVER BITE, Korea)
/ L# E8 W9 {. f+ [% A( P " j$ Y- z9 B! q' A
In Korea, there are now so many directors that belong to young generation like me as well as young investors and producers who are engaged in planning with very progressive ideas. And there are producers who serve as the go-between with investors for this kind of film that is eccentric, odd, small scale, and unlikely to prospect for investment. In my case as well, a producer who had placed trust in me since the time when I was making short films, helped me to realise this film. To give you more detail, this small film was given investment together with a much larger production that was being worked on at the same production company because the investor judged the bigger film would cover cost of the smaller one.5 W/ X- c1 Y; Y. ~$ T* d, Q' u
: p7 _$ y( }3 F: z9 b, V) M/ ^5 }4 b" J# s1 a# z. R' {
Young-minded producers have multiplied since the early 1990s - they wanted to work with rather younger directors of their generation relishing their fresher sensibilities than veteran filmmakers. Also, there was a kind of movement from the late '80s to the early '90s, places for film study such as film schools, film circles at universities, and sorts of school called cinematheque that were open to the public in towns, were on the increase. So, we've come to have younger producers and younger directors. I don't know myself why so many young people just rushed into the film world around that time regardless of risks.
$ |7 a" K$ M6 ~& V: O2 c* bIn Korea, many film courses have actually been set up at universities and colleges and it's now competitive for students to enter. However, I don't think the film industry is capable of absorbing so many potential filmmakers even though it's getting more successful. Nevertheless, those who fail to enter the regular college film courses still study films in their own circles and may end up making short films on their own. It's another mystery what drives them to be enthusiastic.. c- [; v5 `( P r- D0 d
1 }/ V( O1 l% B8 u( z# RWith short films, there are chances to get subsidised by the government or some organisations if the script is judged as excellent, and to be shown at short film festivals or on cable television. Compared to the situation of about six years ago when I was doing short films, they are produced more actively and enjoy more opportunities to be shown to a much wider audience. 5 O9 T2 W* j' g( k, W
Out of the variety of types of films that Korea has, I recognise many young generation directors want to challenge the world they want to express even though their films might not always appeal to the masses. There are also many young directors struggling between popular appeal and art in order to create new type of film. For example, Shiri was excellent entertainment that demonstrated this clear category with melodramatic elements. Joint Security Area was a perfect, mass-provoking movie. It may be saying it too simply but Joint Security Area was successful in terms of both popularity and art, and symbolises the direction in which Korean cinema is going.
v7 l5 [1 `7 n6 u& G
+ z5 u1 O1 y% M: P, l9 x
. f6 W) x! N& S" `# |Barking Dogs Never Bite is my first feature film. I was challenged to include my own world, my taste, and my personal ideas that I had wanted to depict in my short films before. Since I thought it was the best way to depict people's daily lives not to lose my colour or individuality, episodes and characters in the film are based on my own experiences. That is probably why the film has become very weird with too many personal colours, and eventually less appeal to the audience. Yet by leaving large-scale works to other directors, I hope to make films that cannot be made by anyone but myself.6 S9 L6 L, f& z" t5 F
/ Q8 A0 E* l+ D: ]
' Q9 P& O( b! W9 ^* ^4 F---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [3 O& k( d5 K b2 X8 o5 @
Cho Yong-Gyu+ _8 |7 v- R t0 S: j! |8 ^. m, a2 P9 X
Cinematographer of BARKING DOGS NEVER BITE, Korea)
' t% j `7 Y6 }/ ^. a7 I" p" R$ r% _8 v' x1 y$ Q
I took part as cinematographer in six films including Barking Dogs Never Bite, Bad Movie, and Art Museum by the Zoo. They were all films with the exclusion of Bad Movie, in which the director was making their debut. It's probably been three or four years now since half of the productions made in a single year involved debuts by young directors.
9 F( B9 o- }# ?1 L6 C' R: i! h# j, _8 f P# y" ~9 s
I heard that Bad Movie had fewer troubles in the process of planning as the director, Jang Sun-Woo, was one of the directors who formed backbone of Korean cinema and had a long experience. In the case of this Barking Dogs Never Bite, we had to spend time waiting for the investor's final decision because it didn't look like drawing many audiences or give any expectation of being a commercial hit. It also took time to cast; it's a big issue to cast leading characters in Korea. # T6 \) E1 P2 K7 z! x
1 C* B5 }4 z% r1 a3 a6 w# E
Yet I think producers, as a matter of fact, count more on up-and-coming young directors rather than on those with more experience.
. s) x0 f- A) T0 V) |& @: X0 l( |, e# i- F5 S' `9 a: O
------------------------------------------------------------------
3 M# @5 k3 s4 ?7 m- g4 _6 X: A7 ^9 u! w7 V, B3 _
Tadao Sato6 C9 A7 R4 W/ X8 C
(Festival Director General,Japan)6 V6 A0 U, c# h1 C7 M; H6 X
/ S+ {& u- W. e& I: L
It is already common sense that good films exist everywhere in Asia, but as a matter of fact, their golden era came to an end more than 20 or 30 years ago. Despite good world reputation, countries who used to be proud of producing 100 to 200 films a year, now only make ten films. This is because it's getting more difficult to show films to an audience which is threatened by such rivals as television, video, DVD, and piracy that have taken away many people from cinema houses. Of course, it depends on the country - India still has the largest number of productions in the world, and cinema still rules over the Philippines as the most popular form of entertainment and keeps its position as the second largest producer in Asia. On the other hand, however, Mongolia who produced about ten films a year under the socialist regime, is now reconciled to making video films only.
0 p7 l; R2 L1 X4 Q0 \/ n. \" [- |* h7 V7 s- K R& r# _ d
The economic stability of the industry enables a quality story to be made into a fine entertainment which can be enjoyed by a large number of audiences, like in Korea and the Philippines. However, when cinema has some power as an industry from high box-office figures, directors are forced into a hard position in that they cannot make films of their own free choice. It means that companies and producers know pretty well what kind of film will be profitable so that they try to squeeze all their new films into that frame. It's actually happened to the Japanese cinema during its golden age. At present, Japanese cinema is completely divided into mass appeal film and art film. So, the shape of the industry decides the distance between the quality and the commerciality of film. # i; a4 v$ O0 Q( @
What made us take Korean cinema so seriously today is that it's quickly become the most energetic production country in Asia over the last two years, probably since the film hit of Shiri. It seems strange given the situation reported just before this phenomenon that Korean film was on the verge of a crisis. It's obvious why films like Shiri and Joint Security Area that are theme-oriented, gorgeous both in content and expression in a sense, got investment. However, how about Barking Dogs Never Bite that you've just watched here? No one could tell this would be such an interesting film when it was at the screenplay stage, and besides, it was the very first feature for the director. Who invested in this film? It's amazing from the Japanese point of view to see someone pour money into such a delicate, sophisticated film with sensitive detail that is apparently so different from old Korean films.# }* U- x v( }' \
: ^% f( c) C. y3 V
I think there's been a kind of landslide generation shift in Korean cinema; it's not a mere change in the generations itself but some drastic development in the air of the society or people's way of thinking.
: W% X- C' e" E6 m$ f N h& Z% q7 j: G" W
' _- e) z2 P( D" r0 \! W
0 b& t% _ x' T3 r6 J7 y--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 C' B+ m5 X: r$ F s1 s( h5 n! x 5 g% Q1 p( k' [" h2 ^
4 `* u7 D& X4 s) p8 U* M, ~7 K! t- T7 s
7 y0 x W; F X9 Y0 o/ m/ c* f http://www.focus-on-asia.com/e/report/2001/Thrives-E.html* G9 X5 e9 n! \# g
7 {1 b `% z. |! J3 U" S[ Last edited by 阿韩 on 2004-8-13 at 02:56 AM ] |
|