|
|
原帖由 hohomania 于 2010-3-10 03:19 发表
改变很难，但剧中的角色至少为改变而努力过...
这一切终究将在未来产生意义，是要用这样的氛围作结么？
故事的结局尽管可能是开放式的，但不见得是喜剧或以主角全存活收场
或许也不只是把那群有梦想的人，送到世外桃源或深山隐居那么简单...
恩...一个留下余韵和希望的结尾...
真的不好猜，不过猜起来反而更有意思～
可能是个结束在热闹集市中的故事也说不定...
跟张赫和编剧的剧透是吻合的。。。
硬梆梆但却合理的史实要硬拗的确不妥。。。根深蒂固的阶级制度，元孙也的确落寞而终。。。
“即使那时”“改变很难”，“故事的结局”“可能是开放式的”但却是“一个留下余韵和希望的结尾”。。。
------------------------------
credit: soompi/imogene_af
FACT VS FICTION IN SLAVE HUNTERS 推奴中的事实与虚构
Jang Hyuk stars as a chaser of fugitive slaves in the highly popular drama “The Slave Hunters (Chuno),” which airs on Wednesday and Thursday on KBS. The drama deals withs slavery in Joseon Kingdom (1392-1910).
/ Courtesy of KBS
By Chung Ah-young
Staff Reporter
KBS’s drama “The Slave Hunters (Chuno)” is enjoying huge popularity for its heart-pumping action sequences and its focus on those who are often overlooked by history books and dramas.
Set in the Joseon Kingdom (1392-1910), the drama depicts the world of slave hunters and fugitive slaves. Some were born into forced servitude and for others it was a form of legal punishment.
In the drama, a slave hunter named Dae-gil (Jang Hyuk) seeks to track down the escaped Song Tae-ha (Oh Ji-ho). Tae-ha became a slave after being falsely framed for a crime. Dae-gil is also looking for Eon-nyeon (Lee Dae-hae), a female slave he loves.
As the 24-episode drama, which began on Jan. 6, draws to a close, many are wondering what is fact and what is fiction concerning slavery during the era.
The Academy of Korean Studies (AKS) offers a Web-based service to address such questions regarding the drama by providing relevant historical facts analysis.
Did Slave Hunters Really Exist? 推奴手真的存在吗？
In the 18th century, the number of fugitive slaves sharply rose, although their economic situation improved a little with commercial and agricultural development.
To prevent further escapes, the government came up with measures that ended up being unsuccessful. As a result, slave owners began to seek their own solutions.
“`Sokdaejeon" (a supplement to the Nation Code) states that the government punished the illegal chasing of slaves to reduce evil practices carried out by the noble class and slave hunters. Owners were supposed to attain the government’s permission before hiring such hunters. But in most cases, they defied the government.
In the drama, Dae-gil and other slave hunters pursue Tae-ha hoping to earn a bounty. In the historical records, slave hunters were paid with such rewards. According to “Chuangeupgukan,” a book that documented statements of felons, slave hunters could make money but their earnings were considered “unfairly acquired property.”
The academy said that often owners sent other slaves to capture the runaways.
答案是肯定的。但通常奴隶的主人是派其他的奴隶去追逃奴的。
Were Runaway Slaves Stigmatized? 逃奴会被刺字吗？
One of the noticeable points in the drama are the marks made on runaway slaves’ foreheads or chests identifying them as such.
There is a historical record of tyrant King Yeonsan ordering runaway slaves to be marked in 1506.
史书记载，1506年暴君燕山王下令在逃奴身上刺字。
However, as stigmatization was considered a ruthless punishment, it was actually never implemented and was abolished in 1740.
然而，刺字被视为残酷的惩罚，所以从未付诸实行，而在1740年废除。
Instead, slaves were recorded in the official documents that recorded transactions involving them. Fugitive slaves were also documented.
Who Became Slaves? 谁成为奴隶？
The drama portrays more than half of the population falling victim to forced servitude during the reign of King Injo in the early 17th century.
The slavery system, during the Joseon Kingdom, was based on lineage, following a rigid Confucian hierarchy.
Under the law, if one parent was a slave, the children were also. If an owner had a female slave, her children were born into that life. So slavery was one of the best ways to increase an owner’s assets.
Felons became slaves as a legal punishment. In the drama, Tae-ha was originally a high-class military officer but became a slave after being framed for political scheming.
According to the academy, historical documents such as “Daejeonhoetong” (the Comprehensive Compendium of the National Code) prove that there were indeed such cases during the Joseon era.
Some people voluntarily became slaves because of poverty. The historical document recorded one wife becoming a slave in the late 18th century to take care of her husband and pay for a funeral for her father-in-law. Such cases were not rare despite the fact that once they became slaves, their status would be handed down to their children.
Sometimes, due to poverty, parents sold their children as slaves to noble families. For the noble class, this situation offered a good opportunity to buy slaves at a low price.
大概有三种人：世袭（父母之一为奴，兒女即为奴，如惠媛），触法（如太河），贫穷而卖身为奴。
Could Slaves Change Their Destiny? 奴隶的命运可以改变吗？
In the drama, Keun-nom and Eon-nyeon run away after robbing and setting fire to Dae-gil’s house. They succeeded in starting a new life, hiding their original social status.
“Yeongjo Sillok” (The Annals of King Yeongjo) states that there was a figure named Eom Taek-ju who was born as a slave but ran away and passed the state examination to become a civil officer in the royal court.
After his origin was divulged, King Yeongjo ordered a strict punishment for Eom and sent him into exile on Heuksan Island, where he again became a slave.
After being exiled, he fled from the island to Seoul and eventually posted a statement criticizing the state, which was regarded as treason at that time. He was arrested and tortured to death.
The case shows the human will to overcome the obstacles of social status, the academy said.
答案是否定的。有个逃奴通过州考成为朝廷官吏，后来被发现，被王贬到Heuk山岛，后来那个奴隶逃回首尔撰文批评国家，被视为叛国，结果被抓，然后被虐待至死。
For more details, visit www.kostma.net/Contents/Chuno.
chungay@koreatimes.co.kr
Source: http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/art/2.../135_62058.html
[ 本帖最后由 laura1997 于 2010-3-10 08:26 编辑 ] |
|
发表于 2010-3-10 00:30
俺是大吉帮的~
咋办~从不汗的时候，凡是我建的楼，标题都是狗血的~
